FasterXML / FasterXML/java-classmate

Correct approach to compare `ResolvedType` with a raw `Class<?>`?

Aberta
#72 3 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub
Linguagem predominante
Java
Estrelas
266
Forks
47
Merge médio
1h 42min
PRs com merge (30d)
1

Descrição

What's the appropriate way to see if a `ResolvedType` represents a simple class that I know about?

Let's say I pass a `new GenericType{}` to a method, and I just want to see if the generic parameter is `String`. I think (I haven't tried it yet) I would do this (code not optimized, for illustration):

```java
void foo(GenericType genericType) {
TypeResolver typeResolver = new TypeResolver();
ResolvedType resolvedType = typeResolver.resolve(genericType);
```

How would I then see if `resolvedType` indicates a simple `String`? I'm guessing I could do this:

```java
if(resolvedType.getTypeParameters.isEmpty() && resolvedType.getErasedType().equals(String.class)) {

```

But that seems sort of awkward. Is there a better way?

(Note that the `resolvedType.getTypeParameters.isEmpty()` check is arguably not necessary here, as `String` has no generic parameters, but I'm looking for a general approach.)

Or should I be going in the other direction, resolving `String.class` and then comparing the resolved types?

```java
if(resolvedType.equals(typeResolver.resolve(String.class))) {

```

I don't know how much overhead the extra resolution of `String.class` adds, though.

This may be related to #31.

Guia de contribuição

Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório

Avaliação

Esta issue ainda não foi avaliada.

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.