FasterXML / FasterXML/jackson-modules-base

Utilize ByteBuddy's InjectionClassLoader instead of AbstractTypeMaterializer.MyClassLoader

Abierto
#63 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
afterburner
Lenguaje dominante
Java
Estrellas
180
Forks
80
Merge medio
3 h 26 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
1

Descripción

ByteBuddy is able to either wrap or inject defined classes to given classloader whereas MyClassLoader is merely a wrapper. The injection approach would reduce end-user's stack of classloaders by eliminating the need for yet-another classloader.

In #62 I suggested that non-shaded version would be provided because then I could construct the materializer using a non-sealed InjectionClassLoader that contains some custom made abstract classes that I have crafted using ByteBuddy. For those using the shaded the approach would be the more familiar classloader wrapping. For me to start calling the shaded version of ByteBuddy would be rather cumbersome.

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.