Do duplicate names really represent an error?
Ouverte
- Langage dominant
- TypeScript
- Étoiles
- 40
- Forks
- 7
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
In trying to convert the UTG IG, GoFSH reports several errors because of duplicate name. Going into the IG itself, it turns out that indeed, there are cases where two value sets have the same name. However, they have different defining URLs. The question is whether that it legal and acceptable practice, or whether the current behavior of throwing out an error message is correct.
Here's an example of two value sets with the same name but different URL:
https://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet-v2-0719.html
https://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet-v3-InformationSensitivityPolicy.html
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Évaluation
Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.