CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code

BYOK DeepSeek thinking mode: multi-turn 400 'reasoning_content must be passed back'

オープン
#887 コメント 2 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

主要言語
言語のデータがありません
スター
4k
フォーク
350
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

説明

Summary

Every turn after the first fails with HTTP 400 "The reasoning_content in the thinking mode must be passed back to the API." when using a BYOK DeepSeek thinking model. The session is permanently stuck: "Type continue to try again" resends the identical rejected history and fails the same way.

Expected Behavior

Multi-turn BYOK conversations in thinking mode should work. Prior assistant reasoning should be round-tripped in whatever form the provider requires, or omitted from the outgoing history entirely - cmd should never send a half-formed reasoning part. Either way, the session must not become unrecoverable after a provider rejection.

Actual Behavior

The second and every subsequent turn is rejected with a hard 400:

Error: 400 Invalid_request_error
The reasoning_content in the thinking mode must be passed back to the API.

Trace ID: 84656912281782c2007c9b58fed565ad

"Type continue to try again" does not recover the session - retrying resends the same history and fails identically.

Steps to reproduce the issue
  1. Configure a BYOK provider that relays a DeepSeek thinking model in ~/.commandcode/providers.json.
  2. Select that model with thinking enabled.
  3. Send a first message - it succeeds, and the assistant turn is stored with a thinking block whose signature is empty.
  4. Send a second message - the outgoing history contains that assistant turn, and the provider rejects the whole request with the 400 above.
Command Code Version

1.56.1

Operating System

Windows

Terminal/IDE

Orca

Shell

cmd.exe

Session file (optional)

No response

Fix prompt (optional)

Two small changes in dist/cli.mjs, both in the AI SDK message path that BYOK uses:

  1. assistantParts(): the guard (r.signature || r.redactedData) && drops every reasoning part whose signature is empty, which is exactly what cmd persists for BYOK thinking. Do not gate reasoning on signature for providers that have no signature concept - emit the reasoning text with no providerOptions instead.

  2. reasoningProviderOptions(): only maps anthropic and openai.reasoningEncryptedContent. Add a DeepSeek/chat-completions mapping so the previous reasoning text is echoed back as reasoning_content on prior assistant messages.

Verify with a two-turn conversation against a DeepSeek thinking model through a BYOK provider, confirming the second request is accepted. Also consider making "continue" usable after this error instead of resending the identical rejected history.

Additional context

Environment:

  • cmd 1.56.1, Windows (win32 x64), Node v24.16.0, terminal Orca, shell cmd.exe
  • BYOK provider in ~/.commandcode/providers.json: fixcode with baseURL https://api.fixcode.shop/v1, models deepseek-flash and deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp
  • Model in use: fixcode/deepseek-flash

Root cause (read from dist/cli.mjs):

The BYOK path builds provider messages via toAiSdkMessages() -> assistantParts(). The reasoning part is guarded like this:

(r.signature || r.redactedData) && n.push({ type: "reasoning", text: ..., providerOptions: reasoningProviderOptions(r) })

cmd persists BYOK thinking blocks as {"type":"thinking","thinking":"...","signature":""}, so r.signature is "" (falsy) and the reasoning part is never emitted. Prior-turn reasoning never reaches the wire at all.

Even when it is emitted, reasoningProviderOptions() only maps anthropic and openai.reasoningEncryptedContent. DeepSeek-style providers require the raw reasoning text echoed back as reasoning_content on prior assistant messages. "reasoning_content" appears 0 times in the entire dist/cli.mjs bundle.

Note the other serializer, toWireMessages(), pushes {type:"reasoning", text:t.thinking} unconditionally, so the two paths disagree - and only the AI SDK one runs for BYOK.

コントリビューションガイド

このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

dist/cli.mjs の toAiSdkMessages()、assistantParts()、reasoningProviderOptions() から始め、すでに reasoning テキストを出力している toWireMessages() とこの経路を比較します。2ターンの BYOK DeepSeek thinking 会話を再現し、その後、2回目のリクエストが受け付けられることと、continue で再試行しても無効な履歴が再送信されなくなっていることを確認します。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
javascript
領域
api, cli
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
3/5
見積もり時間
1〜2日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
初心者へのやさしさ
76/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。