Comfy-Org / Comfy-Org/github-workflows

cursor-review: label-scoped concurrency lets a veto race an in-flight panel; workflows_ref duplicates the uses: SHA by hand

Ouverte
#251 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
Langage dominant
Shell
Étoiles
6
Forks
1
Merge moyen
14 h 9 min
PR mergées (30 j)
99

Description

Two findings from the Cursor panel reviewing a thin caller (comfy-typescript-sdk#111), both properties of the shared pattern rather than of any one caller, so filing here where the fix can land once.

## 1. The documented caller concurrency group can't cancel across labels
The recommended caller sets:
```yaml
group: cursor-review-pr-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}-${{ github.event.label.name }}
```
The label in the group is load-bearing (this workflow fires on every `labeled`/`unlabeled` event, and a shared per-PR group with `cancel-in-progress: true` would let ANY label add kill an in-flight panel). But it also means the two events that interact — `labeled: cursor-review` and the veto/unblock label — land in different groups and never cancel each other: applying `skip-cursor-review` while a panel is mid-flight runs a Gate that vetoes nothing already running, and toggling both within a panel's runtime can land two full reviews (the head-SHA dedupe is check-then-act, evaluated before either posts). Since the Gate owns the label semantics, the clean fix is probably Gate-side: on a veto event, cancel the PR's in-flight review runs via the API rather than relying on group collision.

## 2. `workflows_ref` is a hand-maintained duplicate of the `uses:` SHA
Every caller pins the reusable workflow by SHA and must copy the same SHA into `workflows_ref` so prompts/scripts load from the same commit — enforced only by a comment. A bump that updates one and not the other silently runs the workflow definition from one commit and its scripts from another. Options: default `workflows_ref` to the workflow's own ref where resolvable, or add a startup assertion that the two match and fail loudly.

Raised by: gpt-5.6-sol-max + claude-opus-5-thinking-max + kimi-k3-high panel legs on the caller PR.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Piste de recherche

Commencez par le point d’entrée partagé de Gate et le traitement réutilisable de workflows_ref par les workflows ; suivez comment les événements étiquetés et non étiquetés forment des groupes de concurrence et comment les appelants associent uses: à workflows_ref. La tâche est terminée lorsque les vetos annulent les revues de PR en cours et que la dérive de SHA est détectée ou éliminée, avec une couverture à la fois des courses entre événements et des incompatibilités de ref.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Évaluation

Stack technique
github-actions
Domaine
ci-cd, devops
Type d'issue
Bug
Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Activité
Active
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Accessibilité débutants
35/100

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.