Comfy-Org / Comfy-Org/github-workflows
cursor-review: label-scoped concurrency lets a veto race an in-flight panel; workflows_ref duplicates the uses: SHA by hand
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Shell
- Sterne
- 6
- Forks
- 1
- Ø Merge
- 14 Std. 4 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 98
Beschreibung
Two findings from the Cursor panel reviewing a thin caller (comfy-typescript-sdk#111), both properties of the shared pattern rather than of any one caller, so filing here where the fix can land once.
## 1. The documented caller concurrency group can't cancel across labels
The recommended caller sets:
```yaml
group: cursor-review-pr-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}-${{ github.event.label.name }}
```
The label in the group is load-bearing (this workflow fires on every `labeled`/`unlabeled` event, and a shared per-PR group with `cancel-in-progress: true` would let ANY label add kill an in-flight panel). But it also means the two events that interact — `labeled: cursor-review` and the veto/unblock label — land in different groups and never cancel each other: applying `skip-cursor-review` while a panel is mid-flight runs a Gate that vetoes nothing already running, and toggling both within a panel's runtime can land two full reviews (the head-SHA dedupe is check-then-act, evaluated before either posts). Since the Gate owns the label semantics, the clean fix is probably Gate-side: on a veto event, cancel the PR's in-flight review runs via the API rather than relying on group collision.
## 2. `workflows_ref` is a hand-maintained duplicate of the `uses:` SHA
Every caller pins the reusable workflow by SHA and must copy the same SHA into `workflows_ref` so prompts/scripts load from the same commit — enforced only by a comment. A bump that updates one and not the other silently runs the workflow definition from one commit and its scripts from another. Options: default `workflows_ref` to the workflow's own ref where resolvable, or add a startup assertion that the two match and fail loudly.
Raised by: gpt-5.6-sol-max + claude-opus-5-thinking-max + kimi-k3-high panel legs on the caller PR.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start with the shared Gate entry point and the reusable workflow handling of workflows_ref; trace how labeled/unlabeled events form concurrency groups and how callers pair uses: with workflows_ref. Done means vetoes cancel in-flight PR reviews and SHA drift is detected or eliminated, with coverage for both event races and ref mismatches.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- github-actions
- Bereich
- ci-cd, devops
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100