[BENCH] Real-world query performance comparison
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 211
- Fork
- 58
- Merge medio
- 1g 17h
- PR unite (30g)
- 6
Descrizione
`examples/ctable/real_world.py` exists but is a fairly raw script. There is no self-contained example that clearly shows what performance gain SUMMARY indexes provide over a full scan, or how block size affects that gain — which is the most common question users will have after enabling auto-indexing.
Suggested work: Write `bench/ctable/summary_index_perf.py` that:
- Generates a synthetic CTable with a few million rows and numeric columns
- Runs the same where() query three ways: no index, SUMMARY at chunk granularity, SUMMARY at block granularity
- Prints a clean results table (rows scanned, time, speedup)
- Includes comments explaining the trade-offs
Ideally, it should work without any external dataset so it can be run immediately after install, but using an accessible dataset is also an option.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.