Azure / Azure/azure-libraries-for-java
Does not seem possible to Create a ContainerGroup with multiple Container Instances
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 97
- Forks
- 102
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
The current Fluent API works well if you know ahead of time what containers so you can hard code the deployment.
I am trying to do:
var containerGroup = azure.containerGroups().define(groupName)
.withRegion(region)
.withExistingResourceGroup(resourceGroupName)
.withLinux()
.withPrivateImageRegistry(registryAddress, username, password)
.withoutVolume()
requests.forEach {
val thing = containerGroup.defineContainerInstance(it.instanceName)
.withImage(it.remoteImageName)
.withExternalTcpPorts(*it.portsToOpen.toIntArray())
.withEnvironmentVariables(it.env)
.attach().withRestartPolicy(ContainerGroupRestartPolicy.ON_FAILURE)
.withDnsPrefix("${it.instanceName}-$networkName")
}
where a loop will add a container instance to the group.
This does not seem possible.
Guía de contribución
Línea de trabajo
Start at the azure.containerGroups().define and defineContainerInstance entry points shown in the Fluent API example, and trace how attach() finalizes each container definition. Done means a ContainerGroup can be built from a loop with all requested instances and remains deployable; the payload names no files or tests to run.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- azure, java
- Área
- cloud
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100