Azure / Azure/azure-libraries-for-java
Does not seem possible to Create a ContainerGroup with multiple Container Instances
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Java
- Sterne
- 97
- Forks
- 102
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
The current Fluent API works well if you know ahead of time what containers so you can hard code the deployment.
I am trying to do:
var containerGroup = azure.containerGroups().define(groupName)
.withRegion(region)
.withExistingResourceGroup(resourceGroupName)
.withLinux()
.withPrivateImageRegistry(registryAddress, username, password)
.withoutVolume()
requests.forEach {
val thing = containerGroup.defineContainerInstance(it.instanceName)
.withImage(it.remoteImageName)
.withExternalTcpPorts(*it.portsToOpen.toIntArray())
.withEnvironmentVariables(it.env)
.attach().withRestartPolicy(ContainerGroupRestartPolicy.ON_FAILURE)
.withDnsPrefix("${it.instanceName}-$networkName")
}
where a loop will add a container instance to the group.
This does not seem possible.
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start at the azure.containerGroups().define and defineContainerInstance entry points shown in the Fluent API example, and trace how attach() finalizes each container definition. Done means a ContainerGroup can be built from a loop with all requested instances and remains deployable; the payload names no files or tests to run.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- azure, java
- Bereich
- cloud
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100