switch_to_blog() - flag for missing subsequent restore_current_blog()

## Describe the solution you'd like

From https://github.com/Automattic/VIP-Coding-Standards/pull/649#discussion_r606174833, it would be worth flagging that `restore_current_blog()` should be called subsequently (if not already).

## What code should be reported as a violation?

```
function switch_blog() {
$id = get_current_blog_id();

if ( $id === 2 ) {
return;
}

switch_to_blog( 2 );
}
```

## What code should *not* be reported as a violation?

```
function switch_blog() {
$id = get_current_blog_id();

if ( $id === 2 ) {
return;
}

switch_to_blog( 2 );
restore_current_blog();
}
```

Repérez la règle ou le sniff existant qui gère switch_to_blog(), puis examinez comment il détermine si un appel est équilibré. Ajoutez une couverture pour les deux exemples de l’issue : signalez un switch sans restore_current_blog() ultérieur, et ne signalez pas le cas restauré.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.