AppImage / AppImage/AppImageKit
Do releases
- Langage dominant
- Aucune donnée de langage
- Étoiles
- 9.4k
- Forks
- 588
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Métriques de PR en attente
Description
The lack of formal releases is [cited](https://twitter.com/Det_Conan_Kudo/status/1036395262166622208) as a reason for poor support of the AppImage format in distributions (like Fedora), desktops (like GNOME), and IDEs (like GNOME Builder).
> You guys have made far too many choices favoring agility without any security.
Hence, we should do formal releases.
How can we do so in a way that does not create too much additional administrative work for us?
* Do time-based (e.g., monthly) releases
* Fully automate the process
* Use a versioning scheme that doesn't break (or approximates) semver (e.g., `3.0.$DATE`) (1=klik, 2=klik2/cmg, 3=AppImage)
What should we formally release?
* libappimage
* appimagetool
* linuxdeploy(qt)
* libappimageupdate
cc @Conan-Kudo
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Évaluation
Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.