ActivityWatch / ActivityWatch/aw-server-rust

Decide bounded-staleness contract for parallel read connections

未关闭
#646 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
Rust
星标
315
派生
96
平均合并
2 天 21 小时
30 天内合并 PR
14

描述

## Question

Is bounded read staleness acceptable for ActivityWatch read endpoints when reads are served from parallel read-only SQLite connections? If yes, what bounds should we design for?

Erik's current preference is:

- under 1 second in the average case
- never more than 1 minute in the worst case

## Why this gates the design

WAL landed in #616, so readers no longer need to block the serial writer. The remaining fork for the parallel-read TODO in `aw-datastore/src/worker.rs` is consistency:

- if bounded staleness is acceptable, reads can use a read-only pool with that freshness contract;
- if read-your-writes is required, dispatch needs a synchronization/guard path before serving a read.

This issue is only to settle the consistency contract; implementation and benchmarking can follow separately.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。