ActivityWatch / ActivityWatch/aw-server-rust

Decide bounded-staleness contract for parallel read connections

Aperta
#646 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub
Lingua principale
Rust
Stelle
315
Fork
96
Merge medio
2g 21h
PR unite (30g)
14

Descrizione

## Question

Is bounded read staleness acceptable for ActivityWatch read endpoints when reads are served from parallel read-only SQLite connections? If yes, what bounds should we design for?

Erik's current preference is:

- under 1 second in the average case
- never more than 1 minute in the worst case

## Why this gates the design

WAL landed in #616, so readers no longer need to block the serial writer. The remaining fork for the parallel-read TODO in `aw-datastore/src/worker.rs` is consistency:

- if bounded staleness is acceptable, reads can use a read-only pool with that freshness contract;
- if read-your-writes is required, dispatch needs a synchronization/guard path before serving a read.

This issue is only to settle the consistency contract; implementation and benchmarking can follow separately.

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.