Abraxas-365 / Abraxas-365/acurio

Transactional and Consistency

Open
#1 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Go
Stars
1
Forks
1
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Let's say one of the repositories fail, how to deal with rollbacks and such? Considering we can't directly expose what database or 3rd party-service we are using on a service layer.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

The issue asks about handling rollbacks across repositories when a failure occurs, without exposing database or third-party service details at the service layer. First, examine the existing service layer and repository implementations in the codebase to understand the current architecture. Look for patterns of transaction management and error handling. Determine what 'repositories' refer to in this context—data access layers, external services, or both. The goal is to propose a design for distributed transaction coordination or compensating transactions that maintains consistency while abstracting underlying details.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go
Domain
backend, databases
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.