Abraxas-365 / Abraxas-365/acurio
Transactional and Consistency
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Let's say one of the repositories fail, how to deal with rollbacks and such? Considering we can't directly expose what database or 3rd party-service we are using on a service layer.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
The issue asks about handling rollbacks across repositories when a failure occurs, without exposing database or third-party service details at the service layer. First, examine the existing service layer and repository implementations in the codebase to understand the current architecture. Look for patterns of transaction management and error handling. Determine what 'repositories' refer to in this context—data access layers, external services, or both. The goal is to propose a design for distributed transaction coordination or compensating transactions that maintains consistency while abstracting underlying details.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- backend, databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100