AOSSIE-Org / AOSSIE-Org/DebateAI
[FEATURE]: Debate Topic Library with Evidence Database
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- TypeScript
- Star
- 84
- Fork
- 198
- Merge trung bình
- 2 ngày 19 giờ
- Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
- 30
Mô tả
Hi Team,
DebateAI provides a strong platform for structured, real-time debates between users and AI.
To further strengthen its educational value, I would like to propose a new feature:
### Debate Topic Library with Evidence Database
Currently, users debate without access to a structured research or evidence system.
This feature would provide a centralized knowledge base to support stronger, more informed debates.
### Proposed Features:
- Curated debate topics by category (Politics, Tech, Ethics, etc.)
- Evidence cards with verified sources
- Bookmark/save evidence for later use
- AI-suggested evidence during debates
- Community-contributed evidence with voting
- Citation generator for academic debates
### Why this matters:
- Encourages research-based debating
- Improves argument quality
- Makes DebateAI more educational
- Helps beginners learn faster
- Builds a knowledge-driven community
### Technical Approach (High-Level)
The feature will include:
- MongoDB collections for Topics, Evidence, and User Saved Evidence
- REST APIs in Go for topic and evidence management
- AI-powered evidence suggestions using LLMs
- React components for browsing topics, saving evidence, and viewing citations
Database will store:
- Debate topics with categories
- Evidence cards with sources, URLs, and community votes
- User bookmarks
APIs:
- GET /api/topics
- GET /api/evidence/:topicId
- POST /api/evidence
- POST /api/evidence/:id/vote
- POST /api/users/save-evidence
AI will suggest evidence during debates based on live argument context.
This approach is modular, scalable, and aligns with the current DebateAI architecture.
@bhavik-mangla I would love to contribute to implementing this feature if it aligns with the project roadmap.
Best regards,
Riya Chandra
Hướng dẫn đóng góp
Chưa lập chỉ mục được hướng dẫn đóng góp cho kho mã nguồn này
Đánh giá
Issue này chưa được đánh giá.