Can we make roco asynchronous and api friendly?
- Lingua principale
- JavaScript
- Stelle
- 82
- Fork
- 11
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Descrizione
A lot of `existsSync`, `readFileSync`, `readDirSync` calls exists at the moment.
`process.exit` buried deep in code — it should be moved out to `bin/roco` imho.
https://github.com/1602/roco/blob/master/lib/rockout.js#L300
I'm really like how it looks but need async and more configs, e.g. pass writable streams to catch remote output, make a prefix with time, disable (or overwrite) string colorize methods, etc.
Can we do something with it?
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Direzione di ricerca
The issue points to lib/rockout.js line 300 as an example of a synchronous call and deep process.exit. Start by examining the codebase for all fs.existsSync, readFileSync, readdirSync, and process.exit calls. Understand the flow from bin/roco through the deployment steps. 'Done' means replacing sync calls with async/await or promises, moving exit handling to the CLI entry point, and designing a configurable API for streams, prefixes, and colorization.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- javascript, nodejs
- Ambito
- cli, tooling
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100