Investigate MorphDOM vs ReactDOM

未关闭
#883 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
javascript, python, react
领域
frontend

调研方向

Start by reviewing the reactpy.html.script behavior and the original discussion in https://github.com/idom-team/idom/discussions/798. Compare how ReactDOM currently handles client-side DOM changes with the proposed MorphDOM alternative. Done means documenting a clear decision on whether to adopt MorphDOM or address the ReactDOM mismatch another way.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

priority-3-low type-investigation

Currently, due to the addition of our reactpy.html.script tag, there is now the potential of user's manually manipulating the client side DOM, which will cause a mismatch when comparing to the server side VDOM. This can cause client side exceptions within ReactDOM when the attempting to change/modify/add/delete nodes or attributes that no longer exist. We may want to consider switching to MorphDOM to account for this, since it could automatically mutate the client DOM to meet the server side VDOM model.

This issue exists to debate whether MorphDOM should be considered as an alternative, or whether we should simply work around these issues with React-DOM.

Note: Originally discussed in https://github.com/idom-team/idom/discussions/798 by Archmonger August 10, 2022

主要语言
Python
星标
8.1k
派生
332
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

reactive-python/reactpy 的其他 Issue

查看 reactive-python/reactpy 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。