Add `limit=` keyword to `int()` and `str()` functions to avoid contention on global `PYTHONINTMAXSTRDIGITS`

未关闭
#98,547 8 条评论 4 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
18/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
python
领域
compilers

调研方向

先从链接的 discuss.python.org 提案及其引用的讨论开始,然后检查 CPython 当前如何将 PYTHONINTMAXSTRDIGITS 应用于 int() 和 str() 转换。该 issue 未指定源文件或测试,因此需要在开始工作之前就 API 行为、实现范围和覆盖范围达成一致。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

3.13 interpreter-core type-feature

Enhancement

With the mitigations for CVE-2020-10735 in place, there's tension between:

  • security-minded folks which need to protect against DoS attacks
  • scientific (and other) use-cases which need to process large numbers in some form

Those are both vying for the one setting (PYTHONINTMAXSTRDIGITS) that controls this, which is unfortunately global state.

Since several such libraries are often loaded in the same runtime, this makes it very tricky to balance.

The idea is simply to add a limit=None keyword to int() and str(), which defaults to PYTHONINTMAXSTRDIGITS if None, but can be set to any other value. Setting it to 0 (for example, or -1) would make it unlimited.

Pitch

This would not solve all the fallout right away, but it would provide a sane path forward, where the default can be safe, and callsites can explicitly opt into saying "I want this call to have a different limit".

In particular, it would not require global state to balance the divergent needs of different parts of the ecosystem anymore.

In case a spectacular new conversion algorithm comes along, the default could eventually be set to infinite again, but the API wouldn't stand out as useless/harmful, but still serve a clear purpose, and so this proposal is independent of future string algorithms or default limits.

Previous discussion

https://discuss.python.org/t/int-str-conversions-broken-in-latest-python-bugfix-releases/18889/
and many more places linked from there

主要语言
Python
星标
77.2k
派生
36k
平均合并
1 天 9 小时
30 天内合并 PR
558

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

python/cpython 的其他 Issue

查看 python/cpython 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。