Add note to DockerHub indicating Alpine images rely on experimental and unofficial-builds

未关闭
#2,011 16 条评论 8 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
docker, node.js
领域
documentation

调研方向

从 DockerHub 的 Node.js 镜像页面开始，将其 Alpine 镜像信息与 Node.js BUILDING.md 中的平台列表以及 unofficial-builds.nodejs.org 进行比较。完成标准是页面明确说明 Alpine 镜像依赖于实验性的、非官方且未签名的 Node.js 构建版本。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

alpine

A somewhat extension to https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node/issues/2000.

I've heard a lot of feedback from users of the Docker Official Node.js Alpine images that they were unaware they rely on experimental status builds (refs: BUILDING.md) from https://unofficial-builds.nodejs.org/. The binaries built into these images are not signed by the Node.js release team which may also be a surprise and/or concern to end users.

I understand the constraints with making those builds an official platform. But, I do think this information is not surfaced well enough today. Users of the pre-built Docker images are unlikely to be looking at the building file in Node.js core repository. It's also easy to see the 'Docker Official' status and assume the contents are as official/supported as the other builds the project provides.

I think we should consider adding a note (or warning?) to the https://hub.docker.com/_/node/ webpage indicating the Alpine Docker images make use of an experimental platform provided by https://unofficial-builds.nodejs.org/.

主要语言
Dockerfile
星标
8.6k
派生
2k
平均合并
10 小时 19 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
16

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

nodejs/docker-node 的其他 Issue

查看 nodejs/docker-node 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Documentation Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。