Q: Is there a way to fail if unknown flags/arguments are passed?
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 领域
- cli
调研方向
从示例中展示的 cli/dispatch* 入口点开始,跟踪未定义参数如何成为分派结果中的条目。定义 strict-mode 下对未知 flag 的预期行为,然后为拼写错误的情况添加覆盖测试,并确认有效 flag 仍然有效。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hi,
If the user passes an undefined flag is there a way to fail the cli/dispatch?
I assume that is a design choice to accept flags which have not been defined, but in some cases might be risky if fore example someone has a typo in a flag.
For example look at the following (contrived) example:
;; this command deletes the given argument
(def delete identity)
(cli/dispatch*
{:command #'delete
:flags ["-v, --verbose" "Increases verbosity"
"--dry-run" "Simulate but do not action"
"--input FILE" "Specify the input file/folder"
"--env=<dev|prod|test>" {:doc "Select an environment" :default "prod"}]}
;; typo in --dryrun (the correct should be --dry-run)
["--input" "all-my-data" "--dryrun"])
;; => {:lambdaisland.cli/sources
;; {:env "--env=<dev|prod|test> (default value)",
;; :input "--input command line flag"},
;; :env "prod",
;; :lambdaisland.cli/argv [],
;; :input "all-my-data",
;; :dryrun 1}
In this example the user might thing that he provided the --dryrun argument, the dispatcher will just dispatch as a new flag ignoring the fact that it was an unintentional mistake and because delete doesn't see the flag :dry-run true it will perform the actual delete.
Is there a way to add a :strict-mode true and fail on undefined flags?
- 主要语言
- Clojure
- 星标
- 56
- 派生
- 1
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。