[Feature] Add subgraph name and version as label to prometheus metrics
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- prometheus, rust
调研方向
定位 BlockStreamMetrics 结构体,并跟踪其字段在哪里变成 Prometheus 指标标签。首先检查现有的 deployment_head 指标路径以及相关测试(如果有)。当指标暴露子图名称和版本标签,并按提议优先使用子图名称时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Description
Currently, I check for the status of my subgraph nodes with the following prometheus query:
(ethereum_chain_head_number{} - ignoring(deployment, job, network, shard) deployment_head{} > 100) and ignoring(deployment, job, network, shard)(deriv(deployment_head{}[10m]) * 60 <= 0)
In simple terms, the query checks for the differences between the ethereum_chain_head_number metric and the deployment_head metric. If it is more than 100 blocks AND there hasn't been any significant changes in the deployment_head value over a 10 minutes window, the node is flagged as out of sync. The two metrics do not have the same labels, hence the ignoring of labels as seen in the query.
This query works fine for nodes hosting one or more subgraphs of different networks. However, when a subgraph of the same network but different subgraphName is deployed to a node, the only way to differentiate them is through the deployment label, which is a hash number that changes for any update and therefore, complex to manage. This introduces an issue as deployment_head starts coming off as a duplicate metric.
sample:
Assuming the two metrics below are for two subgraphs (sepolia-1 and sepolia-2), I can't tell them apart, and as far as I don't filter by deployment, it is a duplicate metric when evaluating it.
deployment_head{deployment=<HASH IPFS deployment number 1>, instance=<node_url>, job="mymetrics", network="sepolia", shard="primary"}
deployment_head{deployment=<HASH IPFS deployment number 2>, instance=<node_url>, job="mymetrics", network="sepolia", shard="primary"}
Proposal:
Add subgraphName and subgraphVersion to the BlockStreamMetrics struct. subgraphName being top priority.
deployment_head{deployment=<HASH IPFS deployment number 1>, instance=<node_url>, job="mymetrics", network="sepolia", shard="primary", subgraph="sepolia-1", version="v0.1.0"}
deployment_head{deployment=<HASH IPFS deployment number 2>, instance=<node_url>, job="mymetrics", network="sepolia", shard="primary", subgraph="sepolia-2", version="v0.1.0"}
Are you aware of any blockers that must be resolved before implementing this feature? If so, which? Link to any relevant GitHub issues.
No response
Some information to help us out
- Tick this box if you plan on implementing this feature yourself.
- I have searched the issue tracker to make sure this issue is not a duplicate.
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 3.2k
- 派生
- 1.1k
- 平均合并
- 4 天 1 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 1
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
graphprotocol/graph-node 的其他 Issue
-
current: include emits an all-null bucket for dimensionless aggregations, nulling the whole response 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
graphprotocol/graph-node#6719 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
graphprotocol/graph-node#6673 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
graphprotocol/graph-node#6650 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
graphprotocol/graph-node#6722 ·
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
graphprotocol/graph-node#6721 ·
查看 graphprotocol/graph-node 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
risk:low runtime status:in-progress type:test
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 92/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11023 ·
-
good first issue refactor
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
kwakseongjae/auto-hwp#319 ·
-
area:cli bug filter-quality good first issue priority:medium
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 72/100
bevyengine/bevy#25861 ·