[WSL] Breakpoints fail to bind when attaching to JVM in WSL2 after Debugger for Java 0.58.3 update; rollback fixes

首先使用提供的 JDWP 命令、Windows VS Code 或 Cursor，以及 controller 中的中斷點重現 WSL2 情境，然後比較 Debugger for Java 0.58.3 與 0.58.2。使用現有 repository 入口調查 java-debug 的 attach 與中斷點行為。完成的標準是中斷點在 WSL2 中能正確繼續執行，同時原生 Windows 行為不受影響。

Environment:

• Host OS: Windows 11, IDE: Cursor/VS Code
• Guest: WSL2 Ubuntu 22.04
• Java: OpenJDK 1.8.0_432 (Java 8)
• Extensions: Debugger for Java 0.58.3 (latest), Language Support for Java 1.47.0
• Spring Boot app running inside WSL2, debugged via JDWP attach on port 5005.

Expected:
Attaching from Windows (Cursor/VS Code) to a JDWP-enabled JVM in WSL2 stops at breakpoints in my project code.

Actual:
After updating to Debugger for Java 0.58.3 and Language Support for Java 1.47.0, attach no longer stops at breakpoints. HTTP requests hang as if the breakpoint is hit, but the IDE never jumps to the code. Attaching using jdb and setting the same breakpoints works fine, so JDWP and class debug info are good.

Rolling both extensions back (Debugger for Java 0.58.2 and Language Support for Java 1.46.0) restores proper behaviour.

Repro steps:

1. Build and run the Spring Boot jar in WSL2 with JDWP:

java -agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=5005 \
  -Dspring.profiles.active=local -Duser.timezone=UTC \
  -jar build/libs/your-app.jar

2. In Windows Cursor/VS Code, attach to 127.0.0.1:5005 (port forwarded via Remote - WSL).
3. Set a breakpoint in any controller method.
4. Send an HTTP request hitting that controller.
5. Observe: request hangs but IDE never shows breakpoint. Meanwhile, jdb attach shows that the breakpoint is hit.

Notes:

• This only occurs when the JVM runs in WSL2 and the IDE is on Windows. A colleague running everything natively on Windows (no WSL) doesn't see the problem.
• address=*:5005 can't be used with Java 8 due to gethostbyname errors.
• This seems like a regression introduced in 0.58.3 (or 0.58.3 + language server update). Rolling back fixes the issue.

Thanks for looking into this.