/tree crashes with RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded on sessions deeper than ~2k entries

未關閉
#865 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
70/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
javascript
領域
cli

研究方向

使用深度大約超過 2,000 個項目的工作階段重現此失敗,然後檢查 issue 中提到的 walker,先從 dist/cli.mjs 中的 SessionStoreV3.getTree() 和 buildNode 開始。也檢查樹狀導覽器的 visitor 以及可見節點 helper。完成的標準是:深層工作階段可以開啟 /tree 而不會出現 RangeError,同時保留回報的走訪輸出與導覽行為。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Summary

Running /tree on a session with a long history crashes the CLI. The tree never opens: the TUI prints an unhandled promise rejection (RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded) and the process exits back to the shell. Long-running sessions therefore cannot use /tree at all — the longer the session, the more certain the crash.

Expected Behavior

/tree opens the session-tree navigator for any session, regardless of how many entries it has.

Actual Behavior

The navigator never renders; the CLI prints the standard crash block and exits:

✖ CRITICAL: Unhandled Promise Rejection!
This is an unexpected error. Please file a bug report at https://github.com/CommandCodeAI/command-code/issues/new
✖ ERROR → RangeError
ℹ REASON → Maximum call stack size exceeded
ℹ ERROR STACK ↓
 RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
    at buildNode (file:///…/command-code/dist/cli.mjs:2:537086)
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at buildNode (file:///…/command-code/dist/cli.mjs:2:537120)
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at buildNode (file:///…/command-code/dist/cli.mjs:2:537120)
    ...

Steps to reproduce the issue

  1. Use a session whose tree is deeper than roughly 2–3k entries — a long linear conversation (depth == number of entries) is enough; heavy rewinding/forking also builds depth.
  2. Run /tree.
  3. The CLI crashes instead of opening the navigator.

Observed with a 12 MB transcript: 4,275 entries, tree depth 4,266, 3 roots, no cycles and nothing corrupt. For contrast, an empty session correctly shows "No session entries yet." without crashing, and a 700-entry session (depth 687) opens fine.

Isolated measurements of the shipped buildNode on synthetic linear chains: depth 2,000 → OK, depth 3,000 → RangeError.

Command Code Version

1.54.1 (latest on npm at the time of writing, so there is no newer release to upgrade to)

Operating System

Linux

Terminal/IDE

tmux 3.x

Shell

fish

Session file (optional)

Not attached — the repro transcript is 12 MB. Happy to share it privately, or run anything you'd like against it.

Fix prompt (optional)

The session-tree walkers recurse once per tree level, so stack depth is proportional to session depth. Convert them to explicit-stack iteration:

  • SessionStoreV3.getTree()buildNode (cli.mjs ≈ 2:537086): const r=(e.get(n.id)??[]).slice().sort(t).map(buildNode)
  • the tree navigator's entryById visitor and buildToolCallMap's inner visit
  • buildVisibleNodes, containsId, reorderActiveFirst, flattenVisibleTree's inner visit

These are all pure traversals with no depth-dependent behavior, so the output should be identical.

Additional context

I patched all seven walkers locally to explicit-stack iteration and verified:

  • the walkers return byte-identical output (JSON, key order included) versus the recursive originals across linear / branchy / wide (13.5k nodes) / deep trees;
  • rendering a 700-entry and a 338-entry session via cmd --session <copy>, captured with tmux, is pixel-identical before and after the change;
  • /tree now opens and navigates the 4,266-deep session (filters, fold/unfold, Esc all work), plus a synthetic 30k-deep one, with no crash.

That patch is a local edit to the minified dist/cli.mjs (it is overwritten on upgrade), so it is not a fix to ship — but the approach may save someone time. I can send the patch script if useful.

Note: the investigation, reproduction and patch above were produced by an AI coding agent (Command Code itself) working against the shipped bundle.

主要語言
沒有語言資料
星號
4k
分支
350
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

CommandCodeAI/command-code 的其他 Issue

查看 CommandCodeAI/command-code 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 CLI Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。