Suspicious translations 疑似缺字：`采`→`采用`？
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
內容修正/fix
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 809
- Forks
- 66
- Avg merge
- 19m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
[!TIP]
Update: The original part of this issue was resolved in #645. Please see https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/644#issuecomment-2582502932 for other parts.
CLReq 目前大多写采用、采取，有些单独的采读不太通，建议改正。
-
单独的
采 -
同一句混合
采用、采 -
个别单独的
采影响断句（与/内文/采/相同而非……/文采/相同）
北大CCL语料库的现代汉语数据中，采用相同出现于 321 个文档，而采相同只出现于 12 个文档，采用比单独的采常用二十多倍。不过我不确定是否有繁简差异。
截图
如果需要，我可以发PR。
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the remaining parts referenced in the issue comment, then inspect the cited passages in index.html at lines 406-407, 1097-1098, and 4236-4237. Confirm which uses of 采 still need correction after #645, update the applicable translation text, and verify that the wording and sentence breaks read correctly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- html
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100