分隔号的竖排问题
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
i:punctuation_etc
i:writing_mode
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 809
- Forks
- 66
- Avg merge
- 19m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
分隔号的现状与目前标准存在一定距离，特别是竖排时的动作非常模糊。本文档是否需要作为 note 写进来？
- 3.1.1.2 的 10 中已经提到了，台湾教育部的《重订标点符号手册》（2008年修订版）中未收录此符号
- 中国国标 GB/T 15834-2011 《标点符号用法》5.1.9 硬性规定其占半个字，5.2.2 也规定在竖排时要躺倒（视觉上变成「扁体的反斜杠」）
- 但事实上存在一个全身的 U+FF0F FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS 且字体实作里（尤其是日文字体）将其绘制成45度倾角，横竖排通用
- Unicode 第 50 号标准附件 中定义，U+002F SOLIDUS 为 R（顺时针旋转 90 度），而 U+FF0F FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS 为 U（直立不变）。因此如果使用 U+002F 就符合 GB 国标规定的动作。
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with issue #623, especially section 3.1.1.2 and the cited GB/T 15834-2011 and Unicode Standard Annex #50 references. Determine whether the separator’s horizontal and vertical behavior is sufficiently specified for a note, and identify the relevant document location. Done means the issue has a clear documentation decision and the resulting standards-based wording is recorded.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation, internationalization
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100