void-linux / void-linux/void-docs
Building documentation using recent versions of mdBook is slightly broken
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- CSS
- Estrellas
- 217
- Forks
- 212
- Merge medio
- 2 d 21 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1
Descripción
This has been discussed in #voidlinux. Here is the original screen capture I posted there which showcases some of the problems:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b90cbd47-aa59-4d7f-8afd-28b9919b9780
Trying to build void-docs with a recent version of mdBook (including v0.4.43 which is the version currently packaged in void-packages) will lead to the following quirks not present in https://docs.voidlinux.org/:
-
Sidebar's links become broken (see https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/issues/2685) (this is probably the most severe problem affecting the usability of the documentation)
-
The selected chapter is not highlighted like in https://docs.voidlinux.org/:
-
There are probably more issues (more minor or specific ones)
Local builds and the void-docs official package are affected.
Cause
This is caused by void-docs' custom theme which completely overrides mdBook's default sidebar logic. Void's substitute code relies on mdBook's toc helper, which endured a breaking change in newer versions of mdBook: https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/issues/2685
Relevant mdBook versions
void-docs' theme resides in src/theme/. Most of it was overhauled by 7281cedcdd99294c93d71f4ef33953bea22cc819. The commit description indicates that these files were made by taking mdBook's default theme files and modifying them to Void's needs.
The void-packages packaged version of mdBook was v0.4.14 at the time of making that commit, so mdBook v0.4.14 default theme files were most likely used as base for void-docs theme.
The Void infrastructure generates https://docs.voidlinux.org/ from the ghcr.io/void-linux/infra-mdbook:20231023R1 container (which is created from here using these files). The ghcr.io/void-linux/infra-mdbook:20231023R1 container includes mdBook v0.4.35, which doesn't suffer from the problem described in https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/issues/2685
Void's changes to mdBook's default theme
Here is a cleaned up diff (I had to reindent void-docs' theme) between mdBook v0.4.14 default theme files and void-docs' current theme files: void-docs-theme-changes.patch.txt
Possible solutions
The most straight forward solution to the sidebar problem would be to somehow convince the relative links generated in here by {{#toc}}{{/toc}} to be relative to path_to_root or to something similar. I personally do not know how to do that or whether it is possible.
Another solution would be to switch to mdBook's default sidebar logic. This would lead to less custom theme logic in void-docs. This would result in the following behavior changes:
-
The sidebar would become scrollable, it would no longer be static.
Most of the other features mentioned here can be relatively easily removed, but preserving the static nature of the sidebar would require heavy modification to mdBook's default sidebar logic (I assume, I haven't tried implementing it). In recent enough versions of mdBook, the sidebar is handled by
<!DOCTYPE HTML> <html lang="{{ language }}" class="{{ default_theme }} sidebar-visible" dir="{{ text_direction }}"> <head> <!-- ... --> <!-- Start loading toc.js asap --> <script src="{{ resource "toc.js" }}"></script> </head> <body> <div id="body-container"> <!-- ... --> <nav id="sidebar" class="sidebar" aria-label="Table of contents"> <!-- populated by js --> <mdbook-sidebar-scrollbox class="sidebar-scrollbox"></mdbook-sidebar-scrollbox> <noscript> <iframe class="sidebar-iframe-outer" src="{{ path_to_root }}toc.html"></iframe> </noscript> <div id="sidebar-resize-handle" class="sidebar-resize-handle"> <div class="sidebar-resize-indicator"></div> </div> </nav> <!-- ... --> </div> </body> </html>A JS version is managed by
toc.jsand a non-JS one is built by mdBook and outputted intotoc.html.The
toc.jsfile would likely have to be modified to preserve the original UI. This file is not one of the files overrideable by mdBook theme, so a custom one would have to be created, modified and shipped alongside the (unused)toc.js. -
Collapse/uncollapse animations would be added.
These are easy to patch out.
-
The selected chapter would also have to be remodified.
-
The UI on mobile devices would presumably also be affected (I haven't tested it)
The non-JS toc.html file mentioned above might be usable as a replacement to {{#toc}}{{/toc}} if void-docs wishes to steer away from mdBook's default sidebar logic.
Things to consider after solving this issue
The ghcr.io/void-linux/infra-mdbook container will have to be updated.
Once that's done, this line will have to be updated to point to the new container. I am not closely familiar with Void's infrastructure, more steps may be necessary.
The void-docs package should be revbumped once this issue gets resolved.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con el tema personalizado en src/theme/, especialmente con src/theme/index.hbs alrededor del uso de {{#toc}}{{/toc}}, y compáralo con el comportamiento reciente del tema de mdBook. Compila void-docs con mdBook v0.4.43 y comprueba los enlaces de la barra lateral y el resaltado del capítulo seleccionado tomando como referencia docs.voidlinux.org. Un cambio completo también debería tener en cuenta la actualización del contenedor infra-mdbook y el revbumping de void-docs.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- css, handlebars, javascript
- Área
- documentation, frontend
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100