DockerComposeContainer doesn't report underlying issue on start failure.

This isn't necessarily a bug but it seems like its a gap in the start up error reporting.

When starting up a test containers, it's failing with the following "Caused by" stacktrace:

Caused by: org.rnorth.ducttape.RetryCountExceededException: Retry limit hit with exception
at org.rnorth.ducttape.unreliables.Unreliables.retryUntilSuccess(Unreliables.java:88)
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.doStart(GenericContainer.java:329)
... 150 more
Caused by: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Could not create/start container
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.tryStart(GenericContainer.java:525)
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.lambda$doStart$0(GenericContainer.java:331)
at org.rnorth.ducttape.unreliables.Unreliables.retryUntilSuccess(Unreliables.java:81)
... 151 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Container did not start correctly.
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.tryStart(GenericContainer.java:463)
... 153 more

None of this is particularly informative.

When directly starting up docker with the same docker-compose.yml, this was reported:

docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml up -d
[+] Running 0/0
 ⠿ Network appevents-provisioner_default  Error                                0.0s
failed to create network appevents-provisioner_default: Error response from daemon: could not find an available, non-overlapping IPv4 address pool among the defaults to assign to the network

Another member on our team directed me to docker network ls:

docker network ls
NETWORK ID     NAME                   DRIVER    SCOPE
1092d4876829   1eylvttsssuk_default   bridge    local
aa08e32c77c6   4fq4vqxbmq2e_default   bridge    local
b9cc9d2c02ea   4gtpimii42dc_default   bridge    local
6f9835452949   bbfhuyndyhge_default   bridge    local
1ae2f01181dd   bridge                 bridge    local
87d9755d65db   ckg9bdaghx2m_default   bridge    local
54bf8b4e66b4   drdafrr8vcuw_default   bridge    local
633a08e00dc8   egj2dr2nhju9_default   bridge    local
42706dd28d31   ghy6amkgx1qr_default   bridge    local
60e415e7890a   gjlmzqcqbyx1_default   bridge    local
8b788e8024a7   h7limppelzbm_default   bridge    local
f8143f373104   hg92szytffyx_default   bridge    local
a2cdb1b4f724   host                   host      local
ada646935572   ictsr19kolym_default   bridge    local
dd94b53a031a   isfskvbc5ixn_default   bridge    local
6cbc5196ca00   izx7kabwwwja_default   bridge    local
4c0fcf45402d   jmushtb7tbix_default   bridge    local
08749d2a7159   k4dugcecebye_default   bridge    local
180ac01fdc35   ks1bev5sildx_default   bridge    local
6ea09990ab86   local_default          bridge    local
9bfb392c156a   mnsecpxyfd9n_default   bridge    local
33f5e7d4a820   ndfqhau1lo1r_default   bridge    local
22ea5a41c9e7   none                   null      local
7c5106cbd5cb   owsqlsjrqmyp_default   bridge    local
d9abe014132f   puij6flbbupl_default   bridge    local
64251795e5ad   r8fq5rm7ny7i_default   bridge    local
b6cc47999a56   rd6mz2aw21vw_default   bridge    local
863c97bd163c   v8cetmwucp3c_default   bridge    local
da195e1d5c01   wdzbew1jmgb6_default   bridge    local
350928c753a5   wzeekb96naqr_default   bridge    local
7934aacf3e73   yjqlo6ve261q_default   bridge    local
dde63911c6ce   zg8uxue47oeh_default   bridge    local

So I googled and discovered "docker network prune -f"

It would have been helpful if the testcontainers start failure had explicitly said what the underlying problem was rather than just "Container did not start correctly."

Thanks,

-Jonathan

Beginne mit DockerComposeContainer und dem im Stack Trace referenzierten GenericContainer-Startpfad und vergleiche anschließend dessen Fehlerberichterstattung mit der im Issue gezeigten Ausgabe des docker-compose.yml-Befehls. Ermittle, an welcher Stelle der zugrunde liegende Docker-Fehler verloren geht, und überprüfe, dass ein Startfehler diese Ursache offenlegt, anstatt nur "Container did not start correctly." auszugeben.