Unexpected behavior from `tf.math.greaterEqual`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 928
- Forks
- 227
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
System information
- Have I written custom code (as opposed to using a stock example script provided in TensorFlow):
Custom code - OS Platform and Distribution (e.g., Linux Ubuntu 16.04):
macOS BigSur 11.1 - TensorFlow installed from (source or binary):
TensorFlow Java latest GitHub, based on karl/tensor-ttype
I have the following code snippet.
Operand<TFloat32> r = tf.random.randomUniform(tf.constant(Shape.of(3,2)), TFloat32.class,
RandomUniform.seed(1001L));
Operand<TFloat32> rate1 = tf.constant(0.5f);
Operand<TBool> mask = tf.math.greaterEqual(r, rate1);
The generated random sequence (shape 3,2) is:
0,0). 0.028465
0,1). 0.936395
1.0). 0.035310
1,1). 0.230565
2,0). 0.269415
2,1). 0.145439
Describe the current behavior
When I run this code, I get mask values of:
0,0). false
0,1). true
1,0). false
1,1). false
2,0). false
2,1). true
Describe the expected behavior
I expected mask values to be:
0,0). false
0,1). true
1,0). false
1,1). false
2,0). false
2,1). false
The last random number, 0.145439, is less than 0.5.
Code to reproduce the issue
Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate the problem.
try (TestSession session = TestSession.createTestSession(TestSession.Mode.GRAPH)) {
Ops tf = session.getTF();
Operand<TFloat32> random = tf.random.randomUniform(tf.constant(Shape.of(3,2), TFloat32.class,
RandomUniform.seed(1001L));
Operand<TFloat32> rate = tf.constant(0.5f);
Operand<TBool> mask = tf.math.greaterEqual(r, rate);
System.out.println("******** MASK ***************");
System.out.println("random:");
session.print(random);
System.out.println("rate1:");
session.print(rate1);
System.out.println("mask:");
session.print(mask);
System.out.println("******** MASK ***************");
}
If I do this code in Python it works as expected:
import tensorflow as tf
a = [
[0.028465 , 0.936395],
[0.035310 , 0.230565],
[0.269415 , 0.145439]
]
print(a);
rate = 0.5
b = tf.math.greater_equal(a, rate);
print(b)
Output:
[[0.028465, 0.936395], [0.03531, 0.230565], [0.269415, 0.145439]]
tf.Tensor(
[[False True]
[False False]
[False False]], shape=(3, 2), dtype=bool)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Java snippet and the TestSession in GRAPH mode, then compare the generated tensor and tf.math.greaterEqual result with the Python example. Reproduce the reported final-element mismatch and identify whether the Java binding or the test setup produces it; done means the behavior is explained and a regression test or corrective change is verified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java, tensorflow
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100