temporalio / temporalio/samples-java
[Bug] moneybatcher sample race condition?
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 258
- 派生
- 189
- 平均合并
- 6 天 4 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 4
描述
What are you really trying to do?
I am trying to learn how to do batching using temporal. I found the moneybatch sample and I wanted to make sure that it can handle requests in parallel.
To simulate the behavior, I changed the workflow to withdraw more times than a single batch size as well as added a delay during the deposit call.
What this lead to is that the workflow would continue to run and not complete, it won't even process a single batch.
Describe the bug
This is related to the condition in the workflow:
Workflow.await(() -> count == batchSize);
If count suddenly goes from 0 to a value greater than batchSize, the workflow will continue to run and not complete.
I am new to temporal, so I am not quite sure how to fix this. Is this a bug in the sample or am I doing something wrong?
Minimal Reproduction
Download this branch:
https://github.com/derwasp/samples-java/tree/derwasp/moneybatcher
Either run ./run-moneybatch-demo.sh and observe the logs.
Or run the test TransferWorkflowTest and see the failure.
Environment/Versions
- OS and processor: M4 Mac
- Temporal Version: (CLI version 1.4.1)
- Are you using Docker or Kubernetes or building Temporal from source? Docker
Additional context
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 core/src/main/java/io/temporal/samples/moneybatch 下的 moneybatch sample 开始,并从链接的复现分支运行 TransferWorkflowTest。检查 Workflow.await 条件,以及针对超过一个 batch 大小的请求的测试设置。完成标准是复现的 workflow 能够完成并处理预期的 batches,而不是一直处于阻塞状态。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- java
- 领域
- distributed-systems
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100