tc39 / tc39/proposal-immutable-arraybuffer

Expose whether an `ArrayBuffer` is detachable

Aperta
#63 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Lingua principale
JavaScript
Stelle
38
Fork
7
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

There is a pre-existing problem with ArrayBuffers in that it is not always possible to determine up-front whether or not a particular instance will succeed in being detached when asked to be transferred. Prior to this proposal, the notable case of an undetectable non-detachable buffer was the buffer exposed by WebAssembly.Memory. (This is as opposed to SharedArrayBuffer, which can be detected via instanceof.)

This proposal adds a new reason that an ArrayBuffer might not be detachable, and it requires a kind-specific check (.immutable) to make the detachability determination. And it seems likely that this won't be the last kind of buffer that won't be detachable.

I'd like to suggest that the fact of detachability be directly represented as a detachable: boolean property. It would be true exactly when a request to transfer() would succeed based on the detachability criterion. The choice of polarity here is intentional, in that an implementation without the property would fail-safe in terms of client code trying to decide between copy or transfer.

To be clear, it is currently possible to recover from a failed transfer with try-catch if one is trying to implement copy-or-transfer. However, that means that a correct case would have to accept the inefficiency of generating and catching an exception. And beyond that inefficiency, it does not make for particularly ergonomic code. And, in general, it's just plain useful to be able to make the determination without actually trying.

I actually ran into exactly this case (wrt WebAssembly.Memory) and during my search for a resolution ended up finding this proposal. So I figured it'd be worth raising the suggestion here. In my case, it was preferable to accept that my code will throw rather than silently degrade performance (punting the performance problem to the caller), but I'd really rather not be in the position to have to make that tradeoff.

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia esaminando le regole attuali di detachability di ArrayBuffer e il comportamento di transfer() descritto in questa issue. Valuta se una proprietà booleana di detachability si adatta alla proposta, includendo la polarità indicata e il caso WebAssembly.Memory; il lavoro è completato quando è stata raggiunta e documentata una decisione di specifica.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
javascript
Ambito
compilers
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Attiva
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
35/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.