[MISC] The Version Checker
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. First review the existing version-checker implementation and the changes from #38 and #83, then determine the current SeqAn and sharg version-reporting paths. The open work is to define behavior for sharg-only use and the future SeqAn3 integration, including the CI check and notification rules.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
SeqAn behaviour (current):
app user = e.g. someone using raptor
app developerr = e.g. Enrico
Call server with current seqan version and current app version. And then:
- Notify user if there is a newer app version
- Notify app developer if there is a newer SeqAn version than the current
- Notify app developer if current app version is newer than the one registered online
I think 1. and 3. can stay as is.
**But what to do about 2. **
a. Do we notify about the sharg version instead? (I guess)
b. But: What happens when we include sharg back in seqan3. Do we still report the sharg version? Since seqan3 would need to update sharg not the app developer using seqan3. Then it's more interesting to update seqan3?
For now we could implement a) and worry about b) when we backport sharg to seqan3.
- Alter version checker when only using sharg, to call the sharg version
- Done by #38
Open Todo: - #83
- Done by #38
- When we backport sharg to seqan3 we need to
- call sharg and seqan3 version
- user should ONLY be notified about a seqan3 version now, NOT sharg
- Our CI should check if seqan3 includes the newest sharg
- The unusal use case, that sharg AND seqan3 are included will be solved by customising the submodules dir
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 11
- Forks
- 9
- Avg merge
- 2h 33m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from seqan/sharg-parser
-
bug
seqan/sharg-parser#303 · 1 assignee ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
seqan/sharg-parser#168 · 7 comments ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
seqan/sharg-parser#165 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
seqan/sharg-parser#161 · 3 comments ·
-
seqan/sharg-parser#153 · 3 comments · 1 assignee ·
All issues in seqan/sharg-parser
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Sensor initialization takes very long when `--initial-sim-time` is set to current UNIX timestamp Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
gazebosim/gz-sensors#662 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
comp-datalake
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#121222 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
LadybirdBrowser/ladybird#12123 ·