Writing to console.log specifically
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 875
- Forks
- 68
- Avg merge
- 9d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
In the FAQ currently we have code like this:
$stdout = Object.new.tap { |obj|
def obj.write(i)
JS.global[:document].write(i)
end
}
Then we can simply use puts, which is convenient.
But how to write to console.log?
Past this point if we use:
JS.global[:document].write "foobar"
It will no longer write to console.log, instead just to primary stdout in the browser.
Is there a way to still write to console.log somehow? Could this be added to FAQ?
If not, could there be a way to show this? I'd like to get debug-like output right
via console.log() as well, so being able to write onto console.log even when having
modified $stdout, would be convenient, in my opinion. Could such a way be added
in addition to ruby.wasm?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the FAQ examples involving $stdout, JS.global, and browser output. Determine whether ruby.wasm already provides a console.log path that remains available after $stdout is replaced; if so, document it in the FAQ, and if not, define the missing capability before proposing an implementation. Done means the console.log behavior and its interaction with redirected stdout are clearly documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby, wasm
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100