ruby / ruby/fiddle

Pseudoclasses via ruby-fiddle?

Ouverte
#103 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Langage dominant
Ruby
Étoiles
195
Forks
53
Merge moyen
23 h 57 min
PR mergées (30 j)
1

Description

Hello fiddle-folks,

fiddle is quite epic. kojix2 wrote the bindings (if you can call them) for libui - see here for
most of the try_extern calls:

https://github.com/kojix2/LibUI/blob/main/lib/libui/ffi.rb

As a "downstream" user, though, fiddle is not easy to use. Often I just get segfaults and
then I end up not understanding why. I can figure out indirectly to some extent and with
helpful comments (e. g. GC kicking in), but by and large I'd love if ruby-fiddle would have
more debug-friendly support - similar to did-you-mean gem or the recent debug-related
changes by mame in MRI ruby.

Having worked with ruby-gtk a lot I am kind of used to modify core widgets such as
Gtk::Windows or Gtk::Box (horizontal and vertical). I like simple APIs such as .add()
or << just to add widgets together, a bit like LEGO building blocks.

With fiddle, though, this is a bit complicated. So the core question for this issue is
whether fiddle could allow for "designated" pseudoclasses? I'd love to build up
classes that can simulate the Gtk widgets to some extent (at the least what libui
allows for; see also libui-ng that has been recently started).

Something where I can build "pseudoclasses" and then at the least the error
messages can be more helpful. Rather than a segfault as such, something
that allows us to investigate which line is faulty or why it crashed (e. g. GC
kicking in). kojix2 showed various work arounds (see the examples he provides
for ruby-libui) but this requires some more expert knowledge than many ruby
developers have. For instance I do not really know C. And while I should really
have learned C properly, ruby is simply more fun to work with! :D

I do not know how easy it would be to have something like pseudoclasses
work, and better error/debug support for fiddle. It's ok if the downstream
dev has to write more code to enable this - I am not really suggesting an
"autofixer" that solves all problems as-is. But something with better debug-support
and to use fiddle in a more ruby-way, including a traditional OOP-like hierarchy.
Getting random SEGFAULTS and not really knowing why can be frustrating.

Other than that fiddle is pretty cool. (ruby-gtk via gobject-introspection also
has this problem partially by the way - the error messages I get are often
not super-useful.)

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Piste de recherche

Commencez par examiner les bindings FFI de libui référencés dans lib/libui/ffi.rb et les exemples de ruby-libui, puis étudiez comment Fiddle expose actuellement les appels natifs et les échecs. Définissez un périmètre concret pour une pseudoclasse et la prise en charge du débogage, notamment la manière dont les utilisateurs identifieraient l’appel défaillant ou un crash lié à GC ; la tâche sera considérée comme terminée lorsqu’un design accepté ou une proposition implémentable et testable sera disponible.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Évaluation

Stack technique
ruby
Domaine
tooling
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Activité
À l'abandon
Clarté
À clarifier
Accessibilité débutants
25/100

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.