redhat-developer / redhat-developer/vscode-java
Inconsistant results when performing a textDocument/references request with multiple anonymous classes
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 2.3k
- Fork
- 546
- Merge medio
- 20h 1m
- PR unite (30g)
- 11
Descrizione
Environment
- Operating System: Windows 10 x64
- JDK version: 17.0.3
- Visual Studio Code version: 1.73
- Java extension version: 1.12
Description
Hello, I have noticed that since the last version of the extension (v 1.12), finding the references of a symbol now includes the declaration of the symbol. This new feature was asked in this issue and was resolved by managing the includeDeclaration provided in the context of the textDocument/references request.
I have tested this new feature and I found some strange results in my opinion. This happens when using anonymous class.
First case with anonymous classes
In the first screenshot I'm sending, I instantiate multiple anonymous classes form the interface ActionListener. And if I ask for the references on a specific actionPerformed method, the language servers returns all the declarations of this method, even if they are from different anonymous classes.

Second classes with named classes
Now in the second screenshot, instead of using anonymous classes, I define multiple classes that implement the ActionListener interface. Now, if I ask for the references on a specific actionPerformed method, this time i will only get the declaration of the given symbol, not the declarations of this method done by the other classes.

Discussion
I'm not really sure, but i do think that the results from the second case (with the named classes) is more "correct". In this case, I do get only the references on the symbol i asked. While in the first case (with the anonymous classes), I also get the declarations done by other anonymous classes that are not related to the specific symbol I ask.
Disable the includeDeclaration ?
And one more question, is it possible to set the includeDeclaration flag to false while using your extension?
Thank's in advance for your returns ;)
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia riproducendo la richiesta textDocument/references con più implementazioni anonime e con nome di ActionListener, confrontando i risultati quando viene usato includeDeclaration. Analizza come l’estensione Java gestisce le dichiarazioni dei metodi delle classi anonime e determina se i riferimenti debbano corrispondere al comportamento delle classi con nome o esporre un modo per disabilitare includeDeclaration.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- java
- Ambito
- devtools
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100