redhat-developer / redhat-developer/vscode-java

Inconsistant results when performing a textDocument/references request with multiple anonymous classes

Aperta
#2,781 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

navigation
Lingua principale
TypeScript
Stelle
2.3k
Fork
546
Merge medio
20h 1m
PR unite (30g)
11

Descrizione

Environment
  • Operating System: Windows 10 x64
  • JDK version: 17.0.3
  • Visual Studio Code version: 1.73
  • Java extension version: 1.12
Description

Hello, I have noticed that since the last version of the extension (v 1.12), finding the references of a symbol now includes the declaration of the symbol. This new feature was asked in this issue and was resolved by managing the includeDeclaration provided in the context of the textDocument/references request.

I have tested this new feature and I found some strange results in my opinion. This happens when using anonymous class.

First case with anonymous classes

In the first screenshot I'm sending, I instantiate multiple anonymous classes form the interface ActionListener. And if I ask for the references on a specific actionPerformed method, the language servers returns all the declarations of this method, even if they are from different anonymous classes.

all-declarations-found

Second classes with named classes

Now in the second screenshot, instead of using anonymous classes, I define multiple classes that implement the ActionListener interface. Now, if I ask for the references on a specific actionPerformed method, this time i will only get the declaration of the given symbol, not the declarations of this method done by the other classes.
just-one-declaration

Discussion

I'm not really sure, but i do think that the results from the second case (with the named classes) is more "correct". In this case, I do get only the references on the symbol i asked. While in the first case (with the anonymous classes), I also get the declarations done by other anonymous classes that are not related to the specific symbol I ask.

Disable the includeDeclaration ?

And one more question, is it possible to set the includeDeclaration flag to false while using your extension?

Thank's in advance for your returns ;)

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia riproducendo la richiesta textDocument/references con più implementazioni anonime e con nome di ActionListener, confrontando i risultati quando viene usato includeDeclaration. Analizza come l’estensione Java gestisce le dichiarazioni dei metodi delle classi anonime e determina se i riferimenti debbano corrispondere al comportamento delle classi con nome o esporre un modo per disabilitare includeDeclaration.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
java
Ambito
devtools
Tipo di issue
Bug
Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Idoneità per principianti
35/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.