reactjs / reactjs/react.dev

Confusing explanation in Challenge 2 of React Learn ("You Might Not Need an Effect")

Abierto Apto para principiantes
#8,099 4 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

type: typos
Lenguaje dominante
JavaScript
Estrellas
11.8k
Forks
7.9k
Merge medio
1 d 11 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
11

Descripción

Summary

The explanation in Challenge 2 (Cache a calculation without Effects) of You Might Not Need an Effect is confusing and somewhat misleading. The challenge suggests that replacing the useEffect with useMemo (or extracting a NewTodo component) reduces the number of calls to getVisibleTodos(), but this isn’t accurate. The original code already avoids unnecessary recomputations.

Page

https://react.dev/learn/you-might-not-need-an-effect

Details

In the original implementation, getVisibleTodos() is only called when either todos or showActive change. Typing in the input only updates the text state, which isn’t part of the dependency array—so getVisibleTodos() is not called on every keystroke.

The proposed useMemo solution behaves the same way: it recalculates getVisibleTodos() when todos or showActive change, and not when text changes. As a result, it doesn’t reduce the number of calls compared to the original implementation. Console logs confirm this.

The second suggested approach (extracting NewTodo into a separate component) gives the impression that the initial code was calling getVisibleTodos() on every input change, but that’s incorrect. The original code was already optimized since text wasn’t part of the effect’s dependencies.

The documentation even says:

“This approach satisfies the requirements too. When you type into the input, only the text state variable updates. Since the text state variable is in the child NewTodo component, the parent TodoList component won’t get re-rendered. This is why getVisibleTodos() doesn’t get called when you type. (It would still be called if the TodoList re-renders for another reason.)”

However, this explanation is misleading because getVisibleTodos() wasn’t being called at every input in the first place.

In short:

The useMemo version doesn’t reduce calls to getVisibleTodos(), it's exactly the same.

The second version’s explanation implies a problem that didn’t exist in the original code.

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Abre la página “You Might Not Need an Effect” y revisa Challenge 2, especialmente las explicaciones sobre useMemo y NewTodo. Verifica el comportamiento de las dependencias descrito en el issue y luego revisa la redacción para que distinga correctamente entre la implementación original y las alternativas; se considera terminado cuando la explicación ya no implica que la implementación original recalcula con cada cambio de entrada.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
javascript, react
Área
documentation
Tipo de issue
Documentación
Dificultad
2/5
Tiempo estimado
1-3 horas
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Claridad
Bien especificado
Aptitud para principiantes
75/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.