[Suggestion]: How to avoid null checks when initializing useRef later
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- JavaScript
- 星號
- 11.8k
- 分支
- 7.9k
- 平均合併
- 1 天 11 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 11
描述
Summary
The example is very bad.
Page
https://react.dev/reference/react/useRef#avoiding-recreating-the-ref-contents
Details
The solution how to avoid this pitfall doesn't seem very robust. If for any reason you wanted to instantiate to VideoPlayer but you want your ref to generally be of type VideoPlayer | null you will never be able to put a null in there.
A more robust way actually seems to leverage useState via:
const [playerRef] = useState(()=>({current:new VideoPlayer()}))
While investigating this issue i've concluded that people in general misunderstand what useRef is, going to the extremes of thinking it's "just for dom elements". playerRef in this snipper is exactly MutableRefObject<VideoPlayer> and this approach doesn't involve all kinds of acrobatics, like lying to a type checker, checks inside the render body etc.
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
閱讀連結的「avoiding recreating the ref contents」部分中的 useRef 文件,並檢視目前的範例及其中所述的型別假設。將提議的 useState 方法與現有指引進行比較,然後更新範例或說明,以釐清預期的 ref 型別、null 行為以及初始化方面的取捨。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- javascript, react
- 領域
- documentation
- Issue 類型
- 文件
- 難度
- 3/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-2 天
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100