Is it possible to remove the extra arrow function here?

Hi!
The tutorial has an example like this:

class Square extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return (
      <button
        className="square"
        onClick={() => this.props.onClick()}
      >
        {this.props.value}
      </button>
    );
  }
}

This component used in the Board component like this:

renderSquare(i) {
    return (
      <Square
        value={this.state.squares[i]}
        onClick={() => this.handleClick(i)}
      />
    );
  }

We have closed the context in a function that we pass to onClick in the Board component.
But why don't we just pass this.props.onClick to onClick in the Square component? Why are we using closures here if we already have the right context inside?

I wrote like this: (link to codepen)

class Square extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return (
      <button
        className="square"
        onClick={this.props.onClick}
      >
        {this.props.value}
      </button>
    );
  }
}

This works successfully

It is clear that the variant from the tutorial will also work. But further it says:

When we modified the Square to be a function component, we also changed onClick={() => this.props.onClick()} to a shorter onClick={props.onClick} (note the lack of parentheses on both sides).

So my variation only works in a functional component? But above it also worked in class components. I think this might confuse some people.

Inizia leggendo le sezioni collegate del tutorial sul sollevamento dello state e sui componenti funzione, poi confronta i due esempi di onClick e la spiegazione che li accompagna. Verifica se l’esempio del componente di classe deve chiarire la differenza tra passare un callback e invocarlo. Il lavoro è completato quando il tutorial spiega chiaramente perché entrambe le forme funzionano e quando è appropriata la forma più breve.