Docs regarding setState are in direct conflict with one another

In Introducting Hooks, and several other places, there is a simple counter example that illustrates how to use the useState hook.

function Example() {
  // Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

  return (
    <div>
      <p>You clicked {count} times</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
        Click me
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}

However, there happens to be another counter example in the Hooks API Reference for useState.

function Counter({initialCount}) {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(initialCount);
  return (
    <>
      Count: {count}
      <button onClick={() => setCount(initialCount)}>Reset</button>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(prevCount => prevCount - 1)}>-</button>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(prevCount => prevCount + 1)}>+</button>
    </>
  );
}

In this second example, a callback is being passed into the setState function, and the code is accompanied by the following language...

The ”+” and ”-” buttons use the functional form, because the updated value is based on the previous value.

This would imply that the first example (which is in a very prominent location in the docs by the way), is actually incorrect and is encouraging an anti-pattern.

I hope you can see how these two examples are in direct conflict with one another and might be causing confusion in the community!

Lies die Counter-Beispiele in Introducing Hooks und der Hooks API Reference, insbesondere den Abschnitt functional-updates, und vergleiche die Hinweise zu setState. Löse die Inkonsistenz, damit die Dokumentation eine klare Erklärung dafür enthält, wann welche Form geeignet ist, und überprüfe anschließend, dass die verlinkten Beispiele und der umgebende Text nicht mehr im Widerspruch zueinander stehen.