Using fetch in useEffect and checking if the component is mounted before setting state
@gaearon 已經在處理了。
開始於 2020年3月11日。
- 主要語言
- JavaScript
- 星號
- 11.8k
- 分支
- 7.9k
- 平均合併
- 1 天 11 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 11
描述
Consider the following code:
const useIsMounted = () => {
const isMounted = React.useRef(false);
React.useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = true;
return () => isMounted.current = false;
}, []);
return isMounted;
};
And the effect:
const [result, setResult] = React.useState({
loading: true,
data: []
})
const isMounted = useIsMounted();
React.useEffect(() => {
console.log('in effect')
fetch('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos')
.then(result => result.json())
.then(data => {
//before setting state in async function you should
// check if the component is still mounted
isMounted.current && setResult({ loading: false, data })
})
},[isMounted])
This code will start a discussion about this being an anti pattern. I think that it's comparing apples with oranges and that article does not apply here.
The useEffect clean up examples show a situation where variables in the callback's closure don't go out of scope and can cause a memory leak but the fetch example won't have that problem.
Is it possible to provide examples of how to safely combine setting state with asynchronous fetch result while not setting it on unmounted components?
It is possible to cancel a fetch (maybe in all browser with the correct babel configuration) but when using SSR (like next.js) and using something like isomorphic-fetch then this is not an option.
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。