<View /> doesn't recalculate it's size when a descendant <Text /> changes height due to wrapping following a device rotation
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- C++
- Étoiles
- 127k
- Forks
- 25.3k
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 23 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 4
Description
🐛 Bug Report
I believe I've found a bug in the View size calculation logic in React Native. In certain cases, the ancestor View fails to recalculate its size if a descendant <Text /> component changes in size due to a rotation and subsequent text (re)wrapping.
The following shows three states: initial, rotated, and back to original orientation. Notice that the fuschia view "grows" after returning to the original orientation.
Initial orientation
Portrait
Back to initial orientation
Speculative Analysis and Workaround
This appears to be an issue where an ancestor view caches a layout calculation and doesn't trigger a re-calculation when a nested Text component changes in size due to orientation changes.
After some playing around, we've figured out that if you "poke" any of the style properties that affect the view's style layout, the view will recalculate and be correct. We did this by toggling a state var upon rotation and then adding/removing a style object to the view's styles array that contained an extra paddingBottom that mirrored the existing padding on the view (basically we changed the style but the effect had no changes to the layout).
You can see a demo of the workaround by uncommenting the line of code below the FIXME comment in the code sample.
To Reproduce
See the code, but basically if you have a <ScrollView> that contains a container <View> which contains another <View> and then have a <Text> element inside that view... this layout bug will happen. I haven't been able to reduce this example further than that.
Expected Behavior
After rotating and going back to the initial orientation, the View should be exactly the same size.
Code Example
Github repo: https://github.com/jeremywiebe/react-native-text-orientation-bug
Environment
React Native Environment Info:
System:
OS: macOS 10.14.2
CPU: (8) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz
Memory: 34.97 MB / 16.00 GB
Shell: 3.0.0 - /usr/local/bin/fish
Binaries:
Node: 8.15.0 - /usr/local/bin/node
Yarn: 1.13.0 - /usr/local/bin/yarn
npm: 6.4.1 - /usr/local/bin/npm
Watchman: 4.9.0 - /usr/local/bin/watchman
SDKs:
iOS SDK:
Platforms: iOS 12.1, macOS 10.14, tvOS 12.1, watchOS 5.1
Android SDK:
API Levels: 23, 25, 27
Build Tools: 23.0.1, 25.0.0, 25.0.2, 25.0.3, 27.0.3, 28.0.1, 28.0.2, 28.0.3
System Images: android-16 | Intel x86 Atom, android-16 | Google APIs Intel x86 Atom, android-19 | Intel x86 Atom, android-19 | Google APIs Intel x86 Atom, android-23 | Google APIs Intel x86 Atom_64, android-24 | Google APIs Intel x86 Atom, android-24 | Google Play Intel x86 Atom, android-25 | Google APIs Intel x86 Atom, android-28 | Google Play Intel x86 Atom
IDEs:
Android Studio: 3.1 AI-173.4907809
Xcode: 10.1/10B61 - /usr/bin/xcodebuild
npmPackages:
react: 16.6.3 => 16.6.3
react-native: 0.58.4 => 0.58.4
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par le dépôt de reproduction lié et reproduisez la séquence de rotation impliquant ScrollView, des composants View imbriqués et le retour à la ligne de Text. Lisez la logique de calcul de la taille de View décrite dans le rapport et comparez les orientations initiale, portrait et restaurée. Le travail est terminé lorsque le View ancêtre retrouve exactement la même taille sans le workaround de changement de style.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- react-native
- Domaine
- mobile-dev
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100