Missing warning message when coercing double to integer64
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
Research direction
Start by running the reported as.integer64(c(9223372036854776000)) example and trace the double-to-integer64 coercion path. Compare it with values that do emit warnings, then add coverage for the inconsistent case and verify that oversized doubles produce the expected warning rather than only .
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
In general the warning message when coercing double values that are to high exists. But for some values it does not appear consistently.
as.integer64(c(9223372036854776000))
# integer64
# [1] <NA>
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 40
- Forks
- 13
- Avg merge
- 10h 24m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from r-lib/bit64
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
⚠️ Breaking change
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
r-lib/pkgdepends#485 · 3 comments ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
beginners blocker
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enviPathR OpenBuild Error Build OK Build Warning policies-accepted pre-review precheck-passed
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 84/100
Bioconductor/BiocContributions#207 · 6 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
datacarpentry/semester-biology#1255 ·