Document Structure and Wishlist
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 302
- Avg merge
- 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Here is how I envision the typing documentation to be structured:
Tutorials
User-facing basic and advanced introductions to the type system or particular aspects of it. Non-comprehensive.
- Typing tutorial – from the ground up (#891)
- Type stub tutorial – writing a type stub for an existing library, stubgen, contributing to typeshed
Howto Guides
Directory: /guides
User-facing guides to accomplish particular tasks.
- How to add typing to an existing code base
- How to annotate a library (#905)
Reference
Directory: /reference
User-facing, comprehensive reference of the type system.
- Link to the typing module documentation
- Probably needs a review
- #851
- Type stub syntax and supported constructs
- Type stub style guide
Type System Specification
Directory: /spec
Territory of the Typing Council. Targeted at type checker developers. Here be dragons. 🐉
Links
Top level.
- Links to all typing-related PEPs
- Links to type checkers and other typing tools
Additions, corrections, criticism welcome!
2014-09-02: Updated to reflect the addition of the type system spec. Also, added explanations to the categories.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the proposed Tutorials, /guides, /reference, /spec, and top-level Links sections, along with linked issues #891, #905, and #851. Determine which documentation work remains and split the broad wishlist into specific, actionable tasks; completion is not defined for the current issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100