Higher-Kinded TypeVars
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 302
- Avg merge
- 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
aka type constructors, generic TypeVars
Has there already been discussion about those?
I do a lot of FP that results in impossible situations because of this. Consider an example:
A = TypeVar('A')
B = TypeVar('B')
F = TypeVar('F')
class M(Generic[F[X], A]):
def x(fa: F[A], f: Callable[[A], B]) -> F[B]:
return map(f, fa)
M().x([1], str)
I haven't found a way to make this work, does anyone know a trick or is it impossible?
If not, consider the syntax as a proposal.
Reference implementations would be Haskell, Scala.
optimally, the HK's type param would be indexable as well, allowing for F[X[X, X], X[X]]
Summary of current status (by @smheidrich, 2024-02-08):
- @JelleZijlstra has indicated interest in sponsoring a PEP, conditional on a prototype implementation in a major type checker and a well-specified draft PEP.
- Drafting the PEP takes place in @nekitdev's fork of the
pepsrepo. The stub PEP draft so far contains a few examples of the proposed syntax. - That same repo's GitHub Discussions forum forum has been designated as the place to discuss the PEP (and presumably the prototype implementation?). Some limited further discussions have taken place there.
- If you want to be notified of new discussion threads, I think you have to set the whole repo as "watched" in GitHub?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the stub PEP draft in the linked peps fork, then read the designated GitHub Discussions forum for the current design and prototype discussion. Done requires a well-specified PEP and a prototype implementation in a major type checker, as noted in the issue summary.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100