python / python/typing

Allow Self or Self-like type arguments for generics

未关闭
#2,276 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

topic: feature
主要语言
Python
星标
1.8k
派生
302
平均合并
23 小时
30 天内合并 PR
8

描述

from contextlib import AbstractContextManager

class ManagerA(AbstractContextManager):
    def __init__(self, x: int) -> None:
        self._x = x
    def __enter__(self) -> int:
        return self._x

This can raise type check errors because AbstractContextManager is a generic type, and this code omits the type argument. Fair enough, and easy to fix:

from contextlib import AbstractContextManager

class ManagerA(AbstractContextManager[int]):
    def __init__(self, x: int) -> None:
        self._x = x
    def __enter__(self) -> int:
        return self._x

But what if we are not overriding the __enter__ method? Consider this example:

from contextlib import AbstractContextManager

class ManagerB(AbstractContextManager):
    def __init__(self, x: int) -> None:
        self._x = x
    # Other methods are defined, but __enter__ is not overridden

In this case, there is no great way to accurate type annotate it in order to reflect the fact that the __enter__ method always returns the object that it was called on (which is the default implementation of the __enter__ method in AbstractContextManager.

If we were willing to mark this class as final, then we could annotate it as:

class ManagerB(AbstractContextManager["ManagerB"]):

And that would work. But if we want to be able to subclass it, then this would no longer be accurate. Consider:

from contextlib import AbstractContextManager
from types import TracebackType
from typing import Type

class ManagerB(AbstractContextManager["ManagerB"]):
    def __init__(self, x: int) -> None:
        self._x = x

    # Other methods are defined, but __enter__ is not overridden

    def __exit__(
            self, exc_type: Type[BaseException] | None,
            exc_val: BaseException | None,
            exc_tb: TracebackType | None) -> bool | None:
        return None

class SubManager(ManagerB):
    def harf(self) -> None:
        print("harf")

with SubManager(1) as subman:
    subman.harf()

This runs fine, but the type checker will rightly complain. The annotations indicate that subman should be of type ManagerB, but ManagerB has no harf attribute.

It feels like it would be appropriate to use:

class ManagerB(AbstractContextManager[Self]):

But Self is not allowed to be used in this context.

The feature I would like to see is some way to accurately handle non-final subclasses of AbstractContextManager that do not overwrite the __enter__ method (or that overwrite it but still return self).

Obviously this issue applies generally to generics -- this is just an obvious example since the Python implementation of that class makes it impossible to type annotate many of its subclasses. But ideally any solution would apply generally to generics -- essentially giving a way to use Self (or something Self-like) as the type argument for a generic.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 AbstractContextManager 示例以及关于将 Self 用作泛型类型参数的既有限制入手。将 ManagerB 和 SubManager 的预期行为与当前关于 Self、子类化和泛型类型参数的规则进行比较。当通用解决方案能够准确推断具体子类,同时保留被重写或继承的 enter 方法的正确行为时,即可视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
python
领域
tooling
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
35/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。