ParamSpec: No support for adding keyword-only argument
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 1.8k
- 派生
- 302
- 平均合并
- 23 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 8
描述
I've been looking through PEP 612 but I just wasn't able to find any way to implement behavior that would allow me to do this:
P = ParamSpec("P")
R = TypeVar("R")
def foo(f: Callable[P, R]) -> Callable[P, List[R]]: # Here, the parameters are actually P + optional kw-only int x = 3
def inner(*args: P.args, x: int = 3, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> List[R]:
results = []
for _ in range(x):
ret = f(*args, **kwargs)
results.append(ret)
return results
return inner
@foo
def bar(p: int):
return p + 2
bar(5) # Acceptable
bar(5, x=8) # Should also be Acceptable
Proposed solution:
Callable[[P.args, x: int = 3, P.kwargs], List[R]]
EDIT: I didn't notice that this was already in rejected alternatives section (I didn't scroll that far), however I still think an implementation like this would be worth adding since I have already encountered the need for this twice and there's simply absolutely no way to handle it.
I'm fine with the proposed syntax suggestion of
Concatenate[("x", int), P]
Though it didn't mention anything about default values, but those could just be handled by a third value in that tuple. It would probably be a lot easier to implement than my proposed suggestion, though to be fair, at least to me, my suggestion looks a bit cleaner.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先阅读 PEP 612 中被否决的替代方案,以及现有的 ParamSpec 和 Concatenate 规范。该 issue 没有列出任何实现文件或测试,因此首先确定 typing-spec 中相关的入口点;完成的要求是为可选的 keyword-only 参数确定一致的语法和明确定义的行为。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- tooling
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 25/100