`unittest.mock.patch` and `unittest.mock.patch.object` are wrongly typed when new_callable is provided
未关闭
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 5.1k
- 派生
- 2.1k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 19 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 82
描述
Steps to reproduce
from unittest.mock import patch
class NewPrinter:
pass
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
print(patched_printer) # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
reveal_type(patched_printer) # "Union[unittest.mock.MagicMock, unittest.mock.AsyncMock]"
Same deal with unittest.mock.patch.object
from unittest.mock import patch
import pprint
class NewPrinter:
...
with patch.object(pprint, "PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
print(patched_printer) # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
reveal_type(patched_printer) # "Union[unittest.mock.MagicMock, unittest.mock.AsyncMock]"
Suggested fix
We discuss unittest.mock.patch in the following, but the same principles apply to unittest.mock.patch.object too
Current signatures:
@overload
def __call__(
self,
target: str,
new: _T,
spec: Any | None = ...,
create: bool = ...,
spec_set: Any | None = ...,
autospec: Any | None = ...,
new_callable: Any | None = ...,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> _patch[_T]: ...
@overload
def __call__(
self,
target: str,
*,
spec: Any | None = ...,
create: bool = ...,
spec_set: Any | None = ...,
autospec: Any | None = ...,
new_callable: Any | None = ...,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> _patch_default_new: ...
There are 2 problems here:
new_callableshouldn't beAny | Nonein the first place, it should only acceptCallable| None, as the it will raise if the provided value is not a callablewith patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=1) as patched_printer: # TypeError: 'int' object is not callable- Need to differentiate the case where new_callable is provided and left as default None
- When
new_callable: Callable[..., T], returns_patch[_T] - When
new_callable: None = ..., returns_patch_default_new
- When
Seems like this would do the job:
@overload
def __call__(
self,
target: str,
new: _T,
spec: Any | None = ...,
create: bool = ...,
spec_set: Any | None = ...,
autospec: Any | None = ...,
new_callable: Callable[..., Any] | None = ...,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> _patch[_T]: ...
@overload
def __call__(
self,
target: str,
*,
spec: Any | None = ...,
create: bool = ...,
spec_set: Any | None = ...,
autospec: Any | None = ...,
new_callable: Callable[..., _T],
**kwargs: Any,
) -> _patch[_T]
@overload
def __call__(
self,
target: str,
*,
spec: Any | None = ...,
create: bool = ...,
spec_set: Any | None = ...,
autospec: Any | None = ...,
new_callable: None = ...,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> _patch_default_new: ...
Testing results
from unittest.mock import patch
class NewPrinter:
pass
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter") as patched_printer:
print(patched_printer) # <MagicMock name='PrettyPrinter' id='125908774402896'>
reveal_type(patched_printer) # MagicMock | AsyncMock
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new=NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
print(patched_printer) # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
reveal_type(patched_printer) # type[NewPrinter]
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable=lambda: NewPrinter) as patched_printer:
print(patched_printer) # <class '__main__.NewPrinter'>
reveal_type(patched_printer) # type[NewPrinter]
# No overload variant matches for non-callable type
with patch("pprint.PrettyPrinter", new_callable="non-callable") as patched_printer:
...
Haven't tried unittest.mock.patch.object yet, but probably same thing
Would be great to see what the maintainers think.
I'll dig deeper and try to open a PR, maybe this weekend, will be my first PR in typeshed :)
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
检查 issue 中显示的 unittest.mock.patch 和 patch.object 重载,然后找到它们的 typeshed 存根和相关测试。检查默认 patching、new、new_callable 以及不可调用的 new_callable 情况下推断出的类型;完成的标准是两个 API 都只接受可调用的 factory,并正确推断所创建对象的类型。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- testing
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 48/100