Indexing TypeVars / need a workaround for higher-kindedness
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 20.6k
- Fork
- 3.3k
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Metriche PR in attesa
Descrizione
I'm using mypy 0.630.
I have a container, which can contain various types, some of which contain further types. I want the root of the container to be able to return grandchild types, or failing that to be able to return fully-specified child types. My first thought doesn't work:
from typing import TypeVar, Generic, List
ContainedType = TypeVar('ContainedType', bound='ContainedCls')
SubContained = TypeVar('SubContained')
T = TypeVar('T')
class Root_wrong(Generic[ContainedType[SubContained]]):
def __init__(self, ct):
# type: (ContainedType[SubContained]) -> None
self.contained = ct
def iter_subcontained(self):
# type: () -> List[SubContained]
return self.contained.items
class ContainedCls(Generic[T]):
def __init__(self, items):
# type: (List[T]) -> None
self.items = items
Because TypeVars can't be indexed.
This also doesn't work, because iter_subcontained can't be typed:
class Root(Generic[ContainedType]):
def __init__(self, ct):
# type: (ContainedType) -> None
# I know because of the bound that ContainedType will have a parameter of its own, but I
# can't refer to it in the `class Root` declaration because TypeVars can't be indexed.
# and the index to Generic has to be a typevar
self.contained = ct
def iter_subcontained(self):
# what goes here?
return self.contained.items
reveal_type(Root(ContainedCls([1])).iter_subcontained()) # Any
Alas, this also doesn't work:
class Root2(Generic[ContainedType, SubContained]):
def __init__(self, ct):
# type: (ContainedType) -> None
# I know because of the bound that ContainedType will have a parameter of its own, but I
# can't refer to it in the `class Root` declaration because TypeVars can't be indexed.
# and the index to Generic has to be a typevar
self.contained = ct
def iter_subcontained(self):
# type: () -> List[SubContained]
return self.contained.items
reveal_type(Root2(ContainedCls([1])).iter_subcontained()) # builtins.list[<nothing>]
# not matching is not an error
reveal_type(Root2[ContainedType[int], str](ContainedCls([1])).iter_subcontained()) # builtins.list[str]
This almost works:
class Root3(Generic[T]):
def __init__(self, ct1, ct2):
# type: (ContainedCls[T], ContainedCls[T]) -> None
self.contained = ct1
self.contained2 = ct2
def iter_subcontained(self):
# type: () -> List[T]
return self.contained.items
class ContainedClsPrime(ContainedCls):
pass
# no way to ensure that ct1 and ct2 are the same container type
# in fact, they aren't even constrained to have the same T!
x = Root3[int](ContainedCls([1]), ContainedClsPrime(['definitely not an int']))
reveal_type(x.iter_subcontained()) # builtins.list[str]
reveal_type(x.contained2.items[0]) # builtins.int* !!!
But it doesn't constrain the two ContainedCls[T]s to be the same ContainedCls subtype, and it doesn't (this really surprised me) even constrain them to be containing the same T! It also seems wrong to be able to make Root3 generic only in the leaf types, and not in any of the intermediate types.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia riproducendo i quattro esempi dell’issue con mypy e confronta i tipi rivelati con le aspettative dichiarate. Leggi la gestione dei generici e di TypeVar rilevante per i TypeVars indicizzati e i tipi di ordine superiore. Il lavoro è completo quando viene stabilito un workaround supportato o un percorso di implementazione chiaramente delimitato per preservare i tipi di contenitore annidati.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- compilers
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Idoneità per principianti
- 30/100