Errors from class decorators returning descriptors

Bug Report

When using a decorator on a nested class that returns a descriptor, mypy is not able to properly distinguish between the class and the instance. The full code is in the gist with the snippets below trying to highlight the problem.

https://gist.github.com/adam-ring/86dc9239fd54e2eafe07829329f39a0d

@overload
def add_register(cls: None = ...) -> RegDescpr[Register]:
    ...
@overload
def add_register(cls: type[T]) -> RegDescpr[T]:
    ...
def add_register(cls: type[T] | None = None) -> RegDescpr[T]:
    return RegDescpr[T](cls)


class FooBlock(RegBlock):

    BAR = add_register()

    @add_register
    class BAZ(Register):
        A = FieldDescpr()
        B = FieldDescpr()

    class BOO_CLS(Register):
        C = FieldDescpr()
    BOO = add_register(BOO_CLS)

foo = FooBlock()

Both foo.BAR and foo.BOO show no errors and run correctly. foo.BAZ lists errors with attribute or method access as will be shown below.

To Reproduce

The method access tests are shown here. Python runs as expected from all three, but mypy complains about an unbound self when accessing foo.BAZ.

foo = FooBlock()
print(f'{foo.BAR.reg_func()=}')  # no error
print(f'{foo.BAZ.reg_func()=}')  # ERROR: reg_func has unbound self
print(f'{foo.BOO.reg_func()=}')  # no error

Expected Behavior

Python runs with all test cases. Here is the output when the gist is run with Python.

$ python3 test_class_dec.py 
Register(name=BAR, RegBlock=FooBlock())
BAZ(name=BAZ, RegBlock=FooBlock())
BOO_CLS(name=BOO, RegBlock=FooBlock())
RegField(name=B, Register=BAZ(name=BAZ, RegBlock=FooBlock()))
RegField(name=C, Register=BOO_CLS(name=BOO, RegBlock=FooBlock()))
foo.BAR.reg_func()=42
foo.BAZ.reg_func()=42
foo.BOO.reg_func()=42
foo.BAZ.A()=5
foo.BOO.C()=5

Actual Behavior

Here is the output from mypy. Only foo.BAZ shows any errors in mypy, the class with the descriptor. The errors are present with method access and with the lower lever Field Descriptor access.

$ mypy test_class_dec.py 
test_class_dec.py:121: error: No overload variant of "__get__" of "FieldDescpr" matches argument types "None", "Type[BAZ]"
test_class_dec.py:121: note: Possible overload variants:
test_class_dec.py:121: note:     def __get__(self, obj: None, objtype: None) -> FieldDescpr
test_class_dec.py:121: note:     def __get__(self, obj: Register, objtype: Type[Register]) -> RegField
test_class_dec.py:125: error: Missing positional argument "self" in call to "reg_func" of "Register"
test_class_dec.py:127: error: No overload variant of "__get__" of "FieldDescpr" matches argument types "None", "Type[BAZ]"
test_class_dec.py:127: note: Possible overload variants:
test_class_dec.py:127: note:     def __get__(self, obj: None, objtype: None) -> FieldDescpr
test_class_dec.py:127: note:     def __get__(self, obj: Register, objtype: Type[Register]) -> RegField

Your Environment

• Python 3.10.4
• mypy 0.981 (compiled: no)

Beginnen Sie damit, mypy für das test_class_dec.py-Beispiel aus dem gist auszuführen und die verschachtelte dekorierte Klasse BAZ mit BAR und BOO zu vergleichen. Verfolgen Sie, wie mypy die Descriptor- und Decorator-Typen behandelt, und bestätigen Sie anschließend, dass der Fix die gemeldeten Fehler entfernt und dabei das gezeigte Laufzeitverhalten beibehält.