Analysis time binding of restricted `Generic`s

Feature

A generic type defined with reference to a restricted type variable only makes sense when containing a value of type within the restrictions of the type variable.

It would then make sense to assume that when the user does not bind the generic type (that is, they do not provide a type argument), the implied type is the Union of the possible bound types.

To Reproduce

from typing import Any
from typing import AnyStr
from typing import Generic


class Message(Generic[AnyStr]):
    header: AnyStr
    content: AnyStr

    def __init__(self, header: AnyStr, content: AnyStr) -> None:
        self.header = header
        self.content = content

# This feels wrong to me, and I'd rather see this as Union[Message[str], Message[bytes]]
m1: Message = Message(header="foo", content="bar")
reveal_type(m1)  # Message[Any]...

# This is perhaps ok, since the user explicitly passed the `Any` parameter. But if this behavior is kept, 
# one shouldn't be forced to provide a type arg to restricted generics in strict mode, since that 
# would imply having to enumerate the restriction to get the same behavior as above.
m2: Message[Any] = Message(header="foo", content="bar")
reveal_type(m2)  # Message[Any]...

Pitch

Say I have a function that accepts any valid Message as an arg:

def read(msg: Message) -> None:
    msg.content.method_in_neither_str_nor_bytes()

If I annotate it like I just did, I get no hand-holding from the type checker. msg.content is understood as Any, so everything goes. We know, however, that this has to be one of AnyStr. If I want type checker assistance, I now have to manually list the possible Message types, like so:

def read(msg: Union[Message[str], Message[bytes]]) -> None:
    msg.content.method_in_neither_str_nor_bytes()

This is fine when the restriction consists of two types, but it should be easy to imagine examples with a more verbose restriction.

Das Issue nennt keine Implementierungsdateien, Tests oder Einstiegspunkte. Beginne mit der Reproduktion und der bestehenden Behandlung ungebundener eingeschränkter Generics; abgeschlossen ist die Änderung, wenn die Vereinigung der zulässigen gebundenen Typen statt Any abgeleitet wird, das Verhalten für explizit angegebenes Any erhalten bleibt und eine Abdeckung für die gezeigten Fälle hinzugefügt wird.