Machine-parsable developers list
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 2.1k
- 派生
- 1k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 12 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 12
描述
We currently have several lists of developers, some manually maintained, some machine-generated, including:
- a machine-parsable list in the voters repo (private)
- a machine-generated (from the list above) developers.csv (in the devguide repo)
- a machine-generated (from the csv above) developer log (in the devguide)
- a separately-maintained list of experts (in the devguide repo)
- a machine-generated (from the list of experts above) nosy-list autocomplete on bpo (no longer used)
- a separately-maintained translators list (in the devguide)
- a separately-maintained CODEOWNERS file (in the cpython repo)
- possibly others (e.g. release managers), more or less related to list of core devs
I suggest to consolidate this into two lists:
- the one in the
votersrepo (private) can remain mostly unchanged - a new list in this repo can be created to list experts
The new list could use a similar format: listing users and fields about:
- their GitHub username
- and possibly the GitHub teams they belong to (to generate teams)
- see python/core-workflow#350
- the modules they maintain (to generate the
CODEOWNERSfile) - the modules, interest areas, platforms, translation languages they are interested in (to generate the expert index)
- the translator table could be moved back into the expert list
- see also #842
- the release manager table in the main page could be generated from this too
- the translator table could be moved back into the expert list
- possibly flags like
is_triager,is_core_dev,release_manager=<versions>,translator=<language>- these could be used to mark names in the expert index and to create RM and translator tables
- we could also have an
is_botfor bots
We should also move some info from the voters file to here, in particular the joined, left, notes info. This information is already public and by moving it here we will remove duplication and simplify the generation of developers.csv in this repo. The only remaining duplicated info between the two lists will be the GitHub username.
Some relevant links:
- PR that implemented a similar idea: #517
- Issue where the idea was proposed: #507
- Discourse message about listing maintainers
- Discourse message about notifying experts
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先阅读此仓库中现有的 developers.csv、experts.rst、翻译文档、CODEOWNERS 以及生成流程。在确定列表格式之前,查看相关的 issue 和 PR #517、#507、#842 以及 python/core-workflow#350。范围达成一致,并且合并后的列表能够在无需重复维护的情况下生成文档化的开发者和 ownership 输出,即视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- github, python
- 领域
- documentation, tooling
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 25/100